Neutrality

➡️ Neutrality & Nonalignment in International Relations
Neutrality in international relations is a strategic stance that allows a state to abstain from participating in military conflicts or alliances. This position can be advantageous, offering a nation the ability to focus on internal development and maintain diplomatic flexibility.
Historically, countries like Switzerland have epitomised neutrality, prioritising diplomacy and peace over militarisation. Neutral countries must navigate complex global dynamics without compromising their principles or security.
Jump straight to our resources on ➡️ Neutrality
Explore our comprehensive guides on -
-
Conflict Regions & the Military
In a world of shifting alliances and rising geopolitical tensions, neutrality provides a shield but under the pressure of surmounting global challenges. The power of neutrality is an underused tool in a world of conflict and military-first approaches.
Austria, Ireland, Malta, and Switzerland are the only four remaining neutral countries in Europe. However, with the continued expansion of NATO and the recent accession of Finland and Sweden, it is becoming increasingly challenging for countries to remain non-aligned. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 pushed them into the 'safety' net of the world's largest military alliance with the loss of long-term stability in the region.
Switzerland is a permanently neutral power which maintains military and political neutrality. Other countries may have disarmed but still lean towards certain countries in terms of values.
Several countries have coded neutrality into law, such as Costa Rica and Uzbekistan. Others have it written in their constitution, including Turkmenistan, Moldova, and Cambodia. Some countries, such as Iceland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Panama, Vatican City, and Mauritius, have no armed forces at all.
Neutral countries must remain impartial, neither assisting nor attacking either side. The countries that are actively participating in the war must respect this stance. Not every country that declares itself neutral follows the Hague guidelines of neutrality, for example, Mexico, whose neutrality has been historically questioned.
Benefits of Neutrality
Neutrality allows a nation to focus on its own interests, fund healthcare, education, and other social needs, maintain peace, and avoid entanglement in external disputes. Switzerland and Vatican City have leveraged their longstanding neutral status to serve as mediators and hosts for peace negotiations, thereby aiding the peace process and contributing to conflict resolution.
Neutral countries also facilitate peace and humanitarian organisations, ensuring the flow of humanitarian aid into conflict areas and promoting the fair treatment of prisoners of war.
Neutrality can also enhance a country's reputation as a stable and reliable partner in the international community.
Neutrality does not have to be a permanent state. Countries will often choose whether to remain neutral on a case-by-case basis after considering many factors, including economic, political, environmental, and humanitarian factors.
For more insight, read "A Little Neutrality FAQ " by Pascal Lottaz.
Author: Rachael Mellor 28.05.25 licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
For further reading on Neutrality see below ⬇️
- Neutral States as Peace Mediators: Favoured or Restrained by Norms? - Wiley 31.12.20471496
- 25 Years Later, Turkmenistan Reaps Zero Benefits From 'Positive Neutrality' - RFE 11.12.20473291
- Book: Neutrality in contemporary international law - James Upcher 04/20471386
- The Laws of Neutrality in the Interconnected World: Mapping the Future Scenarios - ECIL 03/20471360
- Neutral States as Peace Mediators: Favoured or Restrained by Norms? - Swiss Peace, 2020471494
- Why 'permanent neutrality' doesn't work in Cambodia - Bangkok Post 03.01.19473309
- Serbia’s Military Neutrality: Is It Economically Beneficial? - T&F 20.06.18471316
- The Importance of Neutrality in Times of Conflict - AGS 06.11.17471361
- Neutrality, Concept and General Rules - Michael Bothe 10/15471387
- Reflections On Neutrality - Kluwer Mediation Blog 04.04.14471498
- Switzerland's Experiences in Peace Mediation - Edoc 01.01.12473278
- The Republic of Moldova between Neutrality and NATO Memebership Status - Postmodern Openings 10/10473299
- Neutrality and EU membership : are they compatible? - University of Malta, 2000471484
- Journal: Neutrality, a Really Dead Concept? - JSTOR 06/99471310
- Journal: Neutrality beyond the Cold War - JSTOR 07/93471385
- Journal: The Actual and Potential Role of Neutrality: In Search of Peace and Security - JSTOR, 1985471489
- Journal: Cambodian Neutrality - JSTOR 01/67473305
- Journal: Japanese Foreign Policy and Neutralism - JSTOR 01/60473289
- Neutrality and Peace - Foreign Affairs 01.01.37471492
- Neutrality: the hope of living in peace amid war - EHNE471354
- The role of neutral countries in global trade - Economist Impact471363
- Neutral European countries: Austria, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, Ireland - Nato471365
- How does Malta’s neutrality serve the cause of peace? - Justice and Peace Commission471485
- Permanent Neutrality: A Model for Peace, Security, and Justice - Neutrality Studies471487
- Turkmenistan: Significance and legal Foundations of permanent Neutrality - Diplomatic Society473292
- NATO Enlargement’s Impact on Moldovan Neutrality - NATO 473303
- The Vatican and Permanent Neutrality - Neutrality Studies473313